Giovanni Serrapere
Dr. Johns
Seminar in Composition
9/9/08
Blog #2 Group 2
To the Pyncheons “change”, is something that has failed to grace them with its presence. Anyone who lives in the house becomes part of a sardonic cycle in which their lives are snuffed out of them, one way or another. This fate comes from the house’s peccant founding, which the family is well aware of, and it burdens them every minute. I believe Clifford and Hepzibah will be the last to succumb to the house’s power, they will never see significant change. Real change is not possible while living in the Pyncheon house because the old timers are stuck in their ways, and the “curse” is still on the house.
Clifford and Hepzibah are a tragic but humorous example of a dysfunctional couple (not lovers). “They could not flee; their jailer had but left the door ajar in mockery, and stood behind it to watch them stealing out. At the threshold, they felt his pitiless gripe upon them.”(117) that was what happened when they tried to go to church, there was nothing standing in their way but themselves. The pair reminds me of two junkies, co-dependent, and comfortable in their shallow fruitless life. It is not like they don’t see a problem in their behavior they realize it is not normal, and it doesn’t make them happy. “I want my happiness!” At last he murmured, hoarsely and indistinctly, hardly shaping out the words. “Many years have I waited for it! It is late! It is late! I want my happiness!”(109) But their minds puts up inhibitions that prevent significant change in their social lives. Hepzibah also failed at running a store by herself, and had to let Phoebe take over. Hepzibah wasn’t able to fully denounce her unsubstantiated aristocracy. “For what end,” thought she, giving vent to that feeling of hostility which is the only real abasement of the poor in the presence of the rich, “for what good end, in the wisdom of Providence, does that woman live? Must the whole world toil, that the palms of her hands may be kept white and delicate?” Then ashamed and penitent, she hid her face.”(37)Characters around them represent the social and philosophical change of the time, but those values don’t seem to pervade through them. They are bystanders to the metamorphosis in the world around them. Clifford was in a prison for a long period of time, and now has joined Hepzibah in the bigger cell that is their house. They are entrenched in their old ways, with the “curse” acting as the enemy pinning them down; out of the no man’s land that is life.
The story of Colonel Pyncheon and how he attained the house is well communicated within the family, and the town. It has burdened the members of the household whether they realize it or not. The Colonel’s picture represents it, his eye seems to always be watching and ruling over them. “While gazing at the portrait, Hepzibah trembled under its eye.”(40) Whether the curse is a real thing, or exists only in their heads, it has had the effect of a tangible entity. Clifford and Hepzibah both believe they are doomed to have miserable remaining years in store for them. I believe that is true as long as they are in the house, “It cannot be Hepzibah! It is too late,” said Clifford, with deep sadness.” we are ghosts! We have no right among human beings-no right anywhere but in this old house, which has a curse on it, and which, therefore, we are doomed to haunt!”(117) the curse affects all life forms in the house including the once proud lineage of chickens that live in their garden. “The daguerreotypist once whispered her that these marks betokened the oddities of the Pyncheon family, and that the chicken itself was a symbol of the life of the old house, embodying its interpretation, likewise, although an unintelligible one, as such clues generally are.”(105) The town lore no doubt has put even more credibility behind this curse. Hawthorne makes a convincing argument trying to show the power of the curse, he makes us aware of the story of Alice Pyncheon. In the story Matthew Maule, the grandson of the original “wizard” Maule, renews the curse upon the family. “The custody of this secret, that would so enrich his heirs, makes part of your grandfather’s retribution. He must choke with it until it is no longer of any value. And keep you the House of Seven Gables.”(144) That quote states what I believe will be the fate of the family. The heir after Hepzibah will get rid of it and will be the first generation to change, and leave behind the idle aristocracy.
One might point out that there is social change happening in the House of the Seven Gables, because Phoebe and Holgrave are changing the way things are run. The outlook seems more positive, and their lives are filled with more joy when those two are around. But, the change is only temporarily and only the environment is changed. If it was real social change then Hepzibah would not be afraid of going out of the house still. As long as Clifford and his sister both are in their depression and hold defeatist attitudes then the status-quo will not be altered. But, I think it is in the cards for them to undertake this necessary tragedy.
The point of Hawthorne’s theme is to show that history repeats itself, and some things do not change. In this book things never changed, but I believe he would concede that there is a nominal progress in society. Hepzibah and Clifford’s dismal situation shows us that past behaviors have a direct influence on the present. This book conveys the old saying “the sins of the father shall be visited by the son.” According to my theory on how change will come, Phoebe will not inherit the misfortune because she wasn’t a big part of the Pyncheon family until now. So the curse will not affect her, under the condition that she gets rid of the house. Hawthorne’s book makes us question the so called “change” in our life; his use of symbolism leaves an impression that will soon not be forgotten. In my opinion anything that makes one question what was thought to be concrete is fine by me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Revisions
A Jason Miller Project
Overall the essay was very good. That being said, I must now tear it apart. One of the most apparent flaws I found in this essay was the use of quotes. Granted a large number of quotations were mandated from Dr. Jones for this assignment but the quotes could have been cut down. By cut down I mean instead of having a three-line quote use a selected portion of the three line quote to drive to the point. For example in the first body paragraph there is a quote taken from Clifford concerning his happiness. Instead of having your reader dance around why you chose the quote use a smaller version of it. “I want my happiness!” is more effective than “I want my happiness!” At last he murmured, hoarsely and indistinctly, hardly shaping out the words. “Many years have I waited for it! It is late! It is late! I want my happiness!” This forces you to elaborate more on why the quote is relevant. In doing so the essay becomes more of your own instead of an accumulation of Hawthorne quotes.
Another issue I found with the essay was the use of 1st person pronouns. Several times through out the essay I saw the use of “I” believe or “I” think. An essay should not contain any uses of I (I know my hypocrisy is outrageous). The use of I takes some of the thunder out of your argument because the reader does not care about what you think, he/she cares about the cold, hard facts.
Lastly the essay doesn’t really answer the final part of the prompt. Nowhere can it be found that you hinted the relevance of your argument concerning our understanding of the book. Once again great use of quotes, just tweak it a little and the Doc will have no other choice than to give you a 10. By the way I liked the title of the essay.
Revision- Nick Lubic
Your essay begins with an introductory paragraph that is very choppy and does not really introduce a central idea but more of a collection of opinions. You might want to get rid of some of your predictions that you used because they do not really do much for your argument.
Your body paragraphs have several small, insignificant quotes that do not do anything for your argument. For example, your quote on Hephzibah about happiness has no connection to the change you are trying to show. I find that you’re jumping around a lot from one idea to the next before really explaining the thought that you had before. Also, your quote integration really doesn’t make much sense to me.
In the third paragraph, you talk a lot about the curse that the house has and how depressing it is to live in the Pyncheon house. This is a good idea to build off of but, again, you really never bring the change aspect into play.Your paragraph on Phoebe and Holgrave is really the only one that answers the question asked about the counter argument. This, however, is your counter argument and when your counter argument is the strongest part of your paper that is not good. You never convince the reader why we should believe in your argument.
Finally, your last paragraph doesn’t do much other than restating what you think Hawthorne is doing in the book. You also give an unnecessary prediction of how the book will end, which seems out of place.
Comma usage and run on sentences seem to be a problem. Maybe rereading your paper again out loud will allow you to catch some of your mistakes.
Giovanni Serrapere
Dr. Johns
Seminar in Composition
9/9/08
Blog #2 Group 2
To the Pyncheons “change”, is something that has failed to grace them with its presence. Anyone who lives in the house becomes part of a sardonic cycle in which their lives are snuffed out of them, one way or another. This fate comes from the house’s peccant founding, which the family is well aware of, and it burdens them every minute. Clifford and Hepzibah will be the last to succumb to the house’s power; they will never see significant change. Real change is not possible while living in the Pyncheon house because the old timers are stuck in their ways, and the “curse” is still on the house.
Clifford and Hepzibah are a tragic but humorous example of a dysfunctional couple (not lovers). “They could not flee; their jailer had but left the door ajar in mockery, and stood behind it to watch them stealing out. At the threshold, they felt his pitiless gripe upon them.”(117) that was what happened when they tried to go to church, there was nothing standing in their way but themselves. The pair reminds me of two junkies, co-dependent, and comfortable in their shallow fruitless life. It is not like they don’t see a problem in their behavior they realize it is not normal, and it doesn’t make them happy. “I want my happiness!” (109) Clifford shouts this out, saying that he has waited all his life for it. Clifford and Hepzibah’s minds put up inhibitions that prevent significant change in their social lives. Hepzibah also failed at running a store by herself, and had to let Phoebe take over. Hepzibah wasn’t able to fully denounce her unsubstantiated aristocracy. “For what end,” thought she, giving vent to that feeling of hostility which is the only real abasement of the poor in the presence of the rich, “for what good end, in the wisdom of Providence, does that woman live? Must the whole world toil, that the palms of her hands may be kept white and delicate?” Then ashamed and penitent, she hid her face.”(37) Characters around them represent the social and philosophical change of the time, but those values don’t seem to pervade through them. They are bystanders to the metamorphosis in the world around them. Clifford was in a prison for a long period of time, and now has joined Hepzibah in the bigger cell that is their house. They are entrenched in their old ways, with the “curse” acting as the enemy pinning them down; out of the no man’s land that is life.
The story of Colonel Pyncheon and how he attained the house is well communicated within the family, and the town. It has burdened the members of the household whether they realize it or not. The Colonel’s picture represents it, his eye seems to always be watching and ruling over them. “While gazing at the portrait, Hepzibah trembled under its eye.”(40) Whether the curse is a real thing, or exists only in their heads, it has had the effect of a tangible entity. Clifford and Hepzibah both believe they are doomed to have miserable remaining years in store for them. This will remain true as long as they are in the house, “It cannot be Hepzibah! It is too late,” said Clifford, with deep sadness.” we are ghosts! We have no right among human beings-no right anywhere but in this old house, which has a curse on it, and which, therefore, we are doomed to haunt!”(117) the curse affects all life forms in the house including the once proud lineage of chickens that live in their garden. “The daguerreotypist once whispered her that these marks betokened the oddities of the Pyncheon family, and that the chicken itself was a symbol of the life of the old house, embodying its interpretation, likewise, although an unintelligible one, as such clues generally are.”(105) The town lore no doubt has put even more credibility behind this curse. Hawthorne makes a convincing argument trying to show the power of the curse, he makes us aware of the story of Alice Pyncheon. In the story Matthew Maule, the grandson of the original “wizard” Maule, renews the curse upon the family. “The custody of this secret, that would so enrich his heirs, makes part of your grandfather’s retribution. He must choke with it until it is no longer of any value. And keep you the House of Seven Gables.”(144) That quote states what I presume will be the fate of the family. The heir after Hepzibah will get rid of it and will be the first generation to change, and leave behind the idle aristocracy.
One might point out that there is social change happening in the House of the Seven Gables, because Phoebe and Holgrave are changing the way things are run. The outlook seems more positive, and their lives are filled with more joy when those two are around. But, the change is only temporarily and only the environment is changed. The agents of change around them do not have a lasting effect on them. If it was real social change then Hepzibah would not be afraid of going out of the house still. As long as Clifford and his sister both are in their depression and hold defeatist attitudes then the status-quo will not be altered. But, it is in the cards for them to undertake this necessary tragedy.
The point of Hawthorne’s theme is to show that history repeats itself, and some things do not change. In this book things never changed, but I believe he would concede that there is a nominal progress in society. Change is possible, but not when they live in the past, which the house represents. Hepzibah and Clifford’s dismal situation shows us that past behaviors have a direct influence on the present. He believes that mankind progresses in a pattern, which is what is shown in the story. This book conveys the old saying “the sins of the father shall be visited by the son.” Hawthorne’s book makes us question the so called “change” in our life; his use of symbolism leaves an impression that will soon not be forgotten. In my opinion anything that makes one question what was thought to be concrete is fine by me.
Jason - A solid response, with some good discussion of quotes. I've never been called "The Doc" before!
Nick - Not a bad response, but you should have added more to Jason's points, rather than echoing them.
Giovanni - Since you read the whole book, I think the claim that Clifford and Hephzibah will succumb to the house needs clarification - how are they different from Phoebe and Holgrave at the end?
You show detailed knowledge of the beginning & middle of the novel - but even though you posted a revision, you made no adjustments that I can see reflecting your understanding of the end of the novel. You raise Holgrave and Phoebe as examples of possible change, only to dismiss them in a short paragraph. Why is this so easy?
To make a long story short: you fixate on Clifford and Hephzibah, but ignore the very end of the book (when seemingly they change - at any rate, they leave the house!). Why? The reasoning behind your focus is entirely unclear. You do a good, thorough job discussing Clifford and Hephzibah (at least as they are at the beginning) - but don't even bother to explain why we should take this section of the book as definitive, rather than (for instance) the ending.
Post a Comment