Tuesday, September 2, 2008

History Repeating All Around Us

Chris Gorham
Dr. Adam Johns
Seminar In English/Composition
2 September 2008
History Repeating All Around Us
Hawthorne’s story, “The House of the Seven Gables,” does an excellent job to enrich the reader with a surplus of history throughout the first five chapters. In fact, one might say that the history of the rusty old house on Pyncheon Street, in addition to its past and present tenants, is why this story brings so much interest to the reader at the very beginning of the book. History of the Pyncheon’s great and not so great history traced up until the time of Hepzibah shows that there is much overlapping from generation to generation. In this sense, it is fair to say that history, of a person or family, has a way of never dying, but rather passing some of its traits on to its kin. In addition to this, throughout the five chapters it becomes evident that, although history does repeat itself in many ways, it also changes over time as well.

Colonel Pyncheon, the first and most memorable of the Pyncheon, “characterized by an iron energy of purpose” built the family name to prestige. He was a man of determination to his goals and for that fact, very relentless when it came to getting what he wanted. These characteristics of himself, as the ambitious determined, successful man of his time were traced down through each generation to one descendent. As Hawthorne states,

“In almost every generation, nevertheless, there happened to be some descendant of the family gifted with a portion of the hard, keen sense, and practical energy, that had so remarkable distinguished the original founder. His character, indeed, might be traced all the way down, as distinctly as if the Colonel himself, a little diluted, has been gifted with a sort of intermittent immortality on earth.”

The most recent example of this reemergence of a character similar to Colonel Pyncheon himself was found in Cousin Jaffrey, the local Pyncheon who has made a name for himself as a Judge. The emphasis on history’s repetition seems to be the precursor to the gradual improvement in the Hepzibah’s life.

From the reader’s standpoint, it looks very promising for Hepzibah to see Phoebe arise as the bold soul with the spirit and admirable traits of the original Colonel Pyncheon. She begins to bring about the change in not only the rusty old house on Pyncheon, but also in the miserable life of Hepzibah. Hawthorne comments on Phoebe’s impact on the previously lonely house on Pyncheon Street.

“It really seemed as if the battered visage of the House of the Seven Gables, black and heavy-browed as it still certainly looked, must have shown a kind of cheerfulness glimmering through its dusky windows as Phoebe passed to and fro in the interior.”

Hepzibah’s reluctance to change in the reputation of previous Pyncheon women and family pride makes her very fearful to open a cent shop. Instead of elegance, luxury and statuesque, Hepzibah’s endeavors as a cent shop owner would contain hard work, commitment and entrepreneurship, something not regularly known to the general history of Pyncheon woman.

As is true in the story, “The House of Seven Gables,” has a way of repeating itself, even if very minutely in the cases pointed out in the story. Also true, however, is that there is always some variation from time to time. Cousin Jaffrey has proved himself by earning his name and respect as a judge to be a genuine receiver of some of the traits that marked Colonel Pyncheon with such greatness. Phoebe also seems to have the traits of the pioneer Pyncheon, however, there are some distinct variations that can distinguish her from her bold forefather. The world today works in a very similar way. Many of the actions in the present have some correlation or relation to an action in the past showing that much of history can be correlated or traced to a similar event in the past or future.

When thinking of history and its repeating cycles a prime example is war. There has never been a time in history where war hasn’t been evident and many times some wars are exact replicas of others. A prime example is of today’s current war in Iraq having very close comparison to the war that was fought in Vietnam. To some, both are useless attempts at gaining world power and securing some kind of foreign asset. To others, however, both are valid attempts at purging the world of terrorism and hatred against the United States, and in general, democracy.

One more very prime example of history being repetitive in nature is by tracing two men who shared many similarities, but ruled in different time periods. Both had common beliefs in their foreign, economic, and religious policies, each one causing terrible distress and ruin on their countries. Not only this, but both participated greatly in lying to the World community concerning military plans, eventually leading to war with not only our country, but many countries around the world. Two men, two different periods in time, with one common outline of destruction. It is truly apparent that history proved to repeat itself in this case even through different time periods.

It is very evident to see that in history there have been many correlations from past and present. Similar to, “The House of the Seven Gables,” although there are variations from time to time, the overall idea remains the same that history does repeat itself in a way. From Colonel Pyncheon to Jaffrey and Paige within the Pyncheon clan or from Hitler and Hussein, one can not only make a valid correlation between the story and reality but also a correlation between the similarities in history.

Whether we pay attention to it or not, history is always being repeated around us. Within, “The House of the Seven Gables,” it takes a little skill of foreshadowing to see that history may be about to repeat itself in the terms of Paige becoming great similar to how Colonel Pyncheon once was. It is also very interesting to sometimes take a look at current events, like the war in Iraq, and see how it and another event might relate. History’s repetition may not always be a good thing, and in most cases its not, but like Mark Twain once said, “It is not worthwhile to try to keep history from repeating itself, for man’s character will always make the preventing of the repetitions impossible.”

3 comments:

Dana Payne said...

First of all, I like the quote you used at the end of your paper. The corruption and foolishness of human nature does make it inevitable that the mistakes of history will be repeated.

You open up your paper very clearly and lead into the topic well. The recurring traits of a family is one of Hawthorne's themes in many of his books. I also liked the examples you used because they are the most recent and comprehensible for this time period, meaning Iraq and Vietnam. You also pulled a lot of good examples from the book.

My only criticism would be structural and technical, because, frankly, that's what I am best at. As far as the paper goes, it flows, but seems a little choppy to me with ideas cutting off somewhat abruptly in certain spots. I think your sentence structure in certain spots could be a bit more developed and clear. I don't think you properly cited your quotes from the novel either, but other than that I have no complaints. I thought it was a good paper.

Dana Payne said...

First of all, I like the quote you used at the end of your paper. The corruption and foolishness of human nature does make it inevitable that the mistakes of history will be repeated.

You open up your paper very clearly and lead into the topic well. The recurring traits of a family is one of Hawthorne's themes in many of his books. I also liked the examples you used because they are the most recent and comprehensible for this time period, meaning Iraq and Vietnam. You also pulled a lot of good examples from the book.

My only criticism would be structural and technical, because, frankly, that's what I am best at. As far as the paper goes, it flows, but seems a little choppy to me with ideas cutting off somewhat abruptly in certain spots. I think your sentence structure in certain spots could be a bit more developed and clear. I don't think you properly cited your quotes from the novel either, but other than that I have no complaints. I thought it was a good paper.

Adam Johns said...

Your introduction doesn’t really follow the assignment at all; it asked for a short passage, but you’re working with a broad, vague idea. The next several paragraphs are overly wrapped up in summarization; you do ultimately quote a passage (which I think is your focus), but you don’t really explain what *concepts* you see operating in that passage - you aren’t really analyzing it in depth.

You eventually begin to work yourself around to an idea of the novel as working with some kind of idea of repetition-with-a-difference (interesting that you see Phoebe as being like the Colonel; I would have liked more about this). More clearly and immediately presented, this would have been an effective beginning. Your central problem is that you only explain this particular concept of history in very vague terms: you aren’t explaining it precisely through reference to Hawthorne.

Your discussion of Iraq & Vietnam, although overly general, would have worked well if you’d been more precise about your understanding of Hawthorne.

Overall: You don’t follow the assignment particularly well, by not focusing on (analyzing) a particular passage. Your problem with vagueness throughout the paper follows from that, and you end up stumbling into cliches at the end.

Dana: This wasn’t a particularly effective response - you opened with generic praise, and then when you got around to proposing some areas for improvement, you didn’t even give any examples - how we he supposed to figure out what to do from there?

Nitpick: you need to work on your prepositions. For instance, you sometimes use “to” when you should use something else, like “with”.