Bailey Moorhead
ENGCMP 0200
Dr. Adam Johns
March 3, 2009
If Bill McKibben is right, I am going to stop trying right now. I will become a lawyer or a secretary. I’ll live in the same neighborhood of Pittsburgh for the rest of my life. There’s a good chance I’ll get cancer and die at the age of forty-one. What is the use of trying to make my own decisions when my life is predetermined by my genes I’ve inherited from my parents? Perhaps my example is a little extreme, but McKibben’s argument that we will lose our individuality if we genetically modify our children is also extreme. He argues that once we start choosing genes for our children, they will have no meaning because their lives will be predetermined. If this is the case, our lives are predetermined now even without genetic engineering. We are only able to receive alleles from our mothers or our fathers, with the slight chance of mutation causing a new allele. If our genes determine what we can do with our lives, we will become just like our parents. This is obviously not the case. We are able to make decisions about our lives which separate us from the lives our parents have chosen, although we have inherited their DNA. Similarly, if humans become genetically modified, individualism can still thrive. McKibben’s argument that we will lose meaning as a species cannot hold up, because it relies on the fact that humans’ lives are entirely determined by genes inherited and this is not true.
99.9% of human DNA is shared among individuals. This means we only differ with each other by .1%, technically. Despite this, we still show an enormous amount of individuality. Even identical twins can show a great difference in personality traits. If we continue our path of genetic engineering, Bill McKibben believes we will lose a sense of meaning. He believes our individuality is what makes humans human. I don’t necessarily condone designer babies, or engineering humans to have superior genetics, but I do believe that genetic engineering can do a lot in the way of preventing heritable genetic diseases. Even if the technology does become available and people do decide to choose the genes of their children, it will not completely wipe out all individuality. Competition has always been an evident in human societies. If all humans are given a certain gene for optimal performance, running for example, certain humans will still have a harder work ethic and will be able to out-compete their peers. Although certain tasks will be made easier for us, we will still strive to achieve more.
Jimmy Corrigan seems as though he has lost all sense of meaning in his life. He has an overbearing mother, an extremely awkward situation with his father, and the most contact he has with women is with the mailwoman, Peggy. He never seems happy with his life and often escapes into daydreams of Superman, women, or murder. Despite the fact he lives in a modern world, however, it does not mean that he has lost his sense of meaning because of increases in technology. In fact, Ware seems to argue that his lack of meaning stems from a bad childhood and poor relationships with his family by comparing Jimmy’s life to that of his grandfather, also James. Jimmy doesn’t meet his father until he is 36. By this time, he is living a very mundane life with few close relationships. Jimmy often displays a sense of bitterness regarding his lack of a father figure. He sees Superman, a sort of father figure to him, fall to his death and shows little emotion. He dreams of murdering his father. He obviously doesn’t regard father figures very well. This is not a modern development, however. Ware also narrates the story of Jimmy’s grandfather, James. He has an abusive father and his mother died in childbirth. Because of this, he is terrified of his father and is very reluctant to form relationships with others. He disdains his classmates and is shocked when he meets a man, his Italian friend’s father, who is caring. He is extremely inept socially. His grandfather’s story took place before the turn of the 20th century, in a time when genetic engineering did not occur beyond breeding the best crops and livestock together. The grandfather’s sense of meaninglessness is similar to Jimmy’s although they live in very different societies. Their lack of meaning stems from family relationships, rather than diminishing individuality resulting from genetic engineering. The lives of Jimmy and James are extensively affected by their upbringing. James lost his mother as an infant and Jimmy had no relationship with his father until his 30s. By choosing these situations for the characters, Ware is showing that regardless of the traits passed on to Jimmy and James by their parents, they show a sense of meaninglessness because of their childhoods.
McKibben argues that we are losing a sense of meaning as a species as we enter a modern age of GNR technology recklessly. A sense of meaninglessness can be seen, however, in any society at any period of time, as shown in Chris Ware’s graphic novel Jimmy Corrigan: the Smartest Kid on Earth. Both Jimmy and his grandfather show a similar lack of meaning despite the fact that Jimmy lives in a far more technologically advanced world. Our genes do not determine who we are and what we will choose to do with our lives. It is our upbringing, environment, and individual choices that can create a sense of meaning, whether or not we are genetically modified.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
So my title is "Our Lives Are Not Predetermined." I kind of forgot about that.
"If our genes determine what we can do with our lives, we will become just like our parents." -- a starting point of any critique of your argument would be that, in fact, genetic determinism doesn't mean that we are like our parents - after all, our *combination* of genes is completely different from either parent. We are complex, not simple, combinations of our parents' characteristics. There are several other moments in your critique of McKibben where you are in danger of oversimplifying what both McKibben and his opponents say about how we are determined by our genes. The fact that 99.9% of our genes are identical doesn't seem to make the case (to me) that people are not determined by their genes; after all, individual variation in, e.g., the position of our heart in our body would simply lead to death... We vary in those areas (say, personality) where we *can* vary.
I think your discussion of Jimmy's problems as being basically a family problem rather than a technological one is quite good. One thing bothers me, though. If it's a family problem (as it is), and if Jimmy has never known his father (which he hasn't), then why do you take their similar conditions to be counterevidence to genetic determinism? That makes me scratch my head.
Overall: Both sections have strengths, but you also overlook obvious problems in both, and connect them imperfectly.
I kind of rewrote my paper...
Bailey Moorhead
ENGCMP 0200
Dr. Adam Johns
March 19, 2009
To a person of the 19th century, the advancement of technology that has occurred in the past century or so would be unfathomable. Our world is shrinking rapidly as we are now able to communicate instantly with someone on the other side of the globe. Despite the ease with which we are now able to communicate over vast distances, however, technology has allowed us to completely isolate ourselves. We can work, shop, communicate with our friends and family, and entertain ourselves without having to communicate with another human face-to-face. As we slowly transition from face-to-face encounters to phone calls to texting, we are losing our sense of community. In Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan: the Smartest Kid on Earth, the majority of Jimmy’s human interaction happens either on the phone or in his fantasies. He is a caricature of humanity today, which is a product of several decades of rapid advancement of communication technology. In Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age, however, Bill McKibben argues that we are losing our sense of community because each human’s individual meaning will be lost if we continue on our path of genetic engineering. I do believe our sense of community is being lost, but I do not think we should attribute this loss of communal meaning to genetic engineering. Because of advancements in communication technology, not genetic engineering, and the isolation this technology allows us, humanity is losing its ability and desire for a sense of community.
“With the inevitable forward march of progress come new ways of hiding things.” Jimmy’s grandfather’s statement in Jimmy Corrigan rings true in our age of technology. Communication has become infinitely easier with the advent of the Internet and cell phones, yet it has also made isolation much easier. While we are able to communicate instantly with people foreign countries, we also choose to call, rather than visit, our next-door neighbors. We fulfill our family obligations by calling relatives, rather than making the trip to visit. The way we entertain ourselves also contributes to this loss of community; watching television and playing video games do not require human interaction. Virtual reality sites enable us to meet other people online without ever seeing them. We are connected by technology, but also completely isolated by it. Because it is almost unnecessary to meet with others in person to do any daily activity, it doesn’t seem necessary to maintain a sense of community. In Jimmy Corrigan, the majority of Jimmy’s communication happens via the telephone. Jimmy is extremely socially awkward, presumably because he has no practice communicated with other people in person. Though the majority of us still retain our ability to maintain a conversation with others, this could easily change as we rely more and more on technology to communicate.
In Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age, Bill McKibben argues that the human race is losing its meaning on the individual level, which leads to a loss of meaning of the human community as a whole. He believes “the past five hundred years have elevated…and reduced us to the status of individuals,” and predicts we will even lose our individualism in the near future (46). Because of genetic engineering, he says, our parents will completely predetermine our lives by choosing our genes before we are born. Although I agree our sense of community is being lost, I do not believe genetic engineering will contribute to our loss of individual or communal meaning. A belief that choosing genes for our children will strip them of their individuality relies on an assumption that our personalities are entirely determined our genetic code. This can be disproven even on a genetic level; many genes exhibit phenotypic plasticity, in which genes will be expressed differently according to the environment. The environment plays a major role in the development of a human’s characteristics.
Though our society may be able to survive without a sense of community, it is entirely undesirable. We will become a bunch of depressing, pathetic losers like Jimmy Corrigan if we allow this to happen. Our lives are enriched by our relationships and experiences with friends and family and if we lose this, our individual meaning may remain intact, but the meaning of the human race will be lost. Physical interaction between humans is extremely important. For example, infants need nurturing touch for optimal emotional and cognitive development. Though genetic engineering is very controversial and has the potential to cause serious problems within society, such as the development of an upper class of genetically engineered humans, our loss of community stems from our reliance on technology to connect with other humans. Without touch and other face-to-face interaction, we will lose the ability to form meaningful relationships with others and our increasing reliance on technology to communicate is leading us down the path to loss of meaning.
Post a Comment