Thursday, October 16, 2008

A Meaningless Existence

Lauren Fisher
Dr. Adam Johns
ENGCMP 0200 – Seminar in Composition
October 16, 2008

A Meaningless Existence

Have our lives lost collective meaning? Are we leading meaningless lives? According to Bill McKibben and Chris Ware, the answer to both of these questions is yes. In McKibben’s novel “Enough” he claims that technology and germline engineering already has and will wipe away the essence of our lives and take away the things we find meaningful. In Ware’s graphic novel “Jimmy Corrigan” he depicts a character that comes from a broken family and is all alone in the world. He tries to fill the empty voids with his active imagination, but he cannot escape the fact that his life is essentially meaningless. I believe that if we allow technology to take over our lives, it will devoid us of real human interactions with friends and family. Also what was once known as a society or community will just become a bunch of individuals living in the same area.

Family life has changed drastically over the years. When you think of a typical 1950’s family, it most likely was a two-parent household consisting of both a mom and a dad. Divorce was not a common thing because people were expected to get married and stay married. The mom would cook and everyone would sit down to a nice family dinner. Then after dinner, the whole family would watch the same TV show. Now compare this stereotypical family to today’s modern family. Households can consist of two parents, a guardian, step-parents, and several other combinations. The divorce rate today is much higher, almost 50% in America. “The invention of divorce as a mass phenomenon made clear that family no longer carried the meaning we long assumed” (McKibben 45). I know that in my family we very seldom will sit down as a family to eat dinner because everyone has different school, practice, and work schedules. Technology developed in the last century has changed the very nature of family-units. The invention of the car offered us the ability to move over great distances in a short amount of time, the invention of radio and television allowed the unlimited choices of a national or a global culture, and the invention of computers enables us to have a wealth of information at our fingertips. But were these new technological advancements worth what we had to give up? Is it worth it to be able to listen to music on your iPod or watch hours of meaningless TV instead of having an intellectual conversation with your family members? Is it worth it to be able to call or text someone on a cell phone then to actually go to their house and visit with them? McKibben thinks that these changes were upon us before we could do anything about them (45). Whether we accept these changes or not, we are still living in a very technologically advanced society and these new inventions and developments are slowly making us question the meaning of our lives.

Jimmy Corrigan is a prime example of a victim of a modern family. His parents are divorced and his childhood was not very pleasant. Because he never met his father, he sometimes has fantasies about what his father might look like (Ware 30) and even vivid images of killing his father (Ware 39). Perhaps Jimmy is trying to take out some of his pent-up frustration on his father in these fantasies because he never had a father figure growing up. As a result of coming from a broken family, Jimmy develops a lifelong obsession to Superman. Superman serves as both a father figure to Jimmy and as God. Typically, superheroes are supposed to be role models because they have good morals and never let you down. However, Jimmy watches his Superman jump off a building and crash to his death (Ware 16-19). Jimmy later has fantasies about a giant Superman who is as tall as a skyscraper and lifts up Jimmy’s house and throws it to the ground (Ware 52-53). Although Jimmy’s mother calls him obsessively and usually more than once a day, Jimmy feels detached from everyone and feels like a loner. He realizes that his life is meaningless and sometimes has fantasies about killing himself, like when he stepped in front of the moving mail truck (Ware 93).

Another way we have lost collective meaning in our lives is through the loss of community and society. McKibben states, “What’s important is that all of these [technological] changes went in the same direction: they traded context for individual freedom” (45). How can our lives possibly be meaningful if they have no context? It seems that the only way to bring meaning to your life is to find something that you’re passionate about and has a personal significance to you. Jimmy Corrigan doesn’t seem to have a friend in the world, but maybe his personal attachment to Superman and his need for wild fantasies is how he discovers meaning in his life. However, instead of having fantasies where life is good and he’s happy living his life, Jimmy’s fantasies are more like nightmares, full of fearful images and circumstances. McKibben tells us that “today’s world leaves us vulnerable to meaningless – to a world where consumption is all that happens, because there’s nothing else left that means anything. In a way that once was unthinkable, we now have to ask ourselves, ‘Is my life amounting to something? Does it have weight and substance, or is it just running away into nothing, into something insubstantial?’ And the only real resource that many of us have against that meaninglessness […] is our individual selves” (45). This confirms that the only way to find meaning is through our individual self. If technology cuts us off from family, society, community, and civilization, the only thing we’re going to be left with is ourselves.

Consequently, if we don’t find meaning in our lives, we will die alone. We are born alone and we will die alone. At the end of your life you really hope that people are able to look back and see it as a meaningful life. Jimmy is convinced that he will never be happy and will die alone. All Jimmy really longs for is a friend in his life and he wants to be Peggy’s boyfriend, but he’s too shy to ask her and tell her how he feels. Jimmy often fantasizes about women, love, and sex and his father is under the impression that Jimmy does have a girlfriend. Jimmy is an example of the type of people who wonder, “If I were to die tomorrow, who would care and who would show up at my funeral?”

McKibben and Ware both show examples of how modern life is lacking true meaning and how people are reacting to this void in their lives. Some hardly notice it and welcome new technology with open arms because they think that technology is the solution and will make things better, faster, and easier. Others are wary to accept these new changes but go along with them anyway. And then there are those who realize that the benefits do not outweigh the costs and our society might be better off if we stick to our original morals and values, such as family, community, and unity. Jimmy lives in a world with very minimal human contact and Ware shows us reads how bleak of an existence he has. If we do not wish to completely lose the collective meaning of our lives, then we must go out there and find personal meaning for ourselves.

3 comments:

Kate Sisk said...

I think you need a more clear thesis and argument in the opening and you need to follow it up with ideas more related to it.

The second paragraph is a little wordy in the beginning, and then you talk about technological advances, but you don't talk about them like you are against them so much. For example, you say we can now "move long distances in a short amount of time," we have "unlimited choices of a national or a global culture," and a "wealth of information at our fingertips." These all sound pretty great to me. And you do give some arguments about whether these changes were really worth it, but they aren't strong enough. They seem worth it with what you have written.

You use examples of Jimmy's meaningless, sad life in the third paragraph, but the thoughts are a little unorganized because you talk about so many different aspects of his life in one paragraph, such as his father, his mother, superman, and his fantasies. Instead of talking about Jimmy like this, you should use these examples to illustrate your point, which is I'm guessing that the changes are not worthwhile, and you should relate his life more to the loss of meaning of life in our society as a whole. You should add more about how Ware is depicting modern life in general through Jimmy Corrigan.

The second to last paragraph is a little weak and I think your conclusion could be stronger as well. Maybe change the last line "we must go out there and find personal meaning for ourselves." It doesn't seem to fit with your argument. Instead maybe you should say something about why you think these technological advances are not worthwhile.

Lauren Fisher said...

Lauren Fisher
Dr. Adam Johns
ENGCMP 0200 – Seminar in Composition
October 17, 2008

A Meaningless Existence

Have our lives lost collective meaning? Are we leading meaningless lives? According to Bill McKibben and Chris Ware, the answer to both of these questions is yes. In McKibben’s novel “Enough” he claims that technology already has and will wipe away the essence of our lives and take away the things we find meaningful. In Ware’s graphic novel “Jimmy Corrigan” he depicts a character that comes from a broken family and is all alone in the world. He tries to fill the empty voids with his active imagination, but he cannot escape the fact that his life is essentially meaningless. I believe that if we allow technology to take over our lives, it will devoid us of real human interactions with friends and family, thus giving us a meaningless existence.

Family life has changed drastically over the years. When you think of a typical 1950’s family, it most likely was a two-parent household consisting of both a mom and a dad. Divorce was not a common thing because people were expected to get married and stay married. Now compare this stereotypical family to today’s modern family. Households can consist of two parents, a guardian, step-parents, and several other combinations. The divorce rate today is much higher, almost 50% in America. “The invention of divorce as a mass phenomenon made clear that family no longer carried the meaning we long assumed” (McKibben 45). People today see divorces as a way out and don’t honor the lifetime commitment they made to another person. Technology developed in the last century has changed the very nature of family-units. The invention of the car offered us the ability to move over great distances, the invention of radio and television allowed the unlimited choices of a global culture, and the invention of computers enables us to have a wealth of information at our fingertips.

But were these new technological advancements worth what we had to give up? Instead of walking over to someone’s house and visiting with them, we would rather drive to the other side of the state and back, just because we can. Instead of sitting down to a nice family dinner and having an intellectual conversation with your family members, we can just turn on the TV and watch mindless dribble or plug in our ear buds and tune out the world as we listen to our iPod. And instead of asking someone the answer to a question or doing some real research using an encyclopedia, everyone can just Google search the answer to their problem. These changes are cutting us off from our immediate families and friends and instead are putting us on a global scale where we simply become an insignificant username in cyberspace. McKibben thinks that these changes were upon us before we could do anything about them (45). Whether we accept these changes or not, we are still living in a very technologically advanced society and these new inventions and developments are slowly making us question the meaning of our lives.

Chris Ware uses his character Jimmy Corrigan to depict modern life in general. Jimmy is the son of divorced parents: a mother that calls him obsessively at least once every day and a father he has never met before. Because he never met his father, he sometimes has fantasies about what his father might look like (Ware 30) and even vivid images of killing his father (Ware 39). Jimmy is completely cut off from his community and doesn’t have a friend in the world. Jimmy’s lifelong obsession with Superman is an example of the collective loss of meaning in his life. Jimmy considers Superman to be a father figure and tries to use his fantasies to fill the emptiness in his meaningless life. For example, Jimmy has fantasies about a giant Superman who is as tall as a skyscraper and lifts up Jimmy’s house and throws it to the ground (Ware 52-53). Ware is trying to show that these changes are not worthwhile and contribute to the loss of meaning of life in our society as a whole.

Another way we have lost collective meaning in our lives is through the loss of community and society. McKibben states, “What’s important is that all of these [technological] changes went in the same direction: they traded context for individual freedom” (45). How can our lives possibly be meaningful if they have no context? It seems that the only way to bring meaning to your life is to find something that you’re passionate about and has a personal significance to you. Jimmy Corrigan doesn’t seem to have a friend in the world, but maybe his personal attachment to Superman and his need for wild fantasies is how he discovers meaning in his life. However, instead of having fantasies where life is good and he’s happy living his life, Jimmy’s fantasies are more like nightmares full of fearful images and people dying. Jimmy is convinced that he will never be happy and will die alone. All Jimmy really wants is to be Peggy’s boyfriend, but he’s too shy to ask her and tell her how he feels. Jimmy is an example of the type of people who wonder, “If I were to die tomorrow, who would care and who would show up at my funeral?”

McKibben tells us that “today’s world leaves us vulnerable to meaningless – to a world where consumption is all that happens, because there’s nothing else left that means anything. In a way that once was unthinkable, we now have to ask ourselves, ‘Is my life amounting to something? Does it have weight and substance, or is it just running away into nothing, into something insubstantial?’ And the only real resource that many of us have against that meaninglessness […] is our individual selves” (45). This shows that it is up to us to avoid the consumption that is all around us and to make sure that our lives are on track and are still meaningful. McKibben proposes that the only way to find meaning is through our individual self. If technology cuts us off from family, society, community, and civilization, the only thing we’re going to be left with is ourselves.

McKibben and Ware both show examples of how modern life is lacking true meaning and how people are reacting to this void in their lives. Some hardly notice it and welcome new technology with open arms because they think that technology is the solution and will make things better, faster, and easier. Others are wary to accept these new changes but go along with them anyway. Jimmy lives in a world with very minimal human contact and Ware shows us readers how bleak his existence really is. I think that these technological advances are not worthwhile because we are giving up more than we are gaining. If human interaction is reduced to a text message or an IM on the computer, then I don’t think we are leading fulfilling lives. It is not worth it to give up our morals and values such as family and community, just so that we can obtain the latest and greatest technology. If we wish to avoid a meaningless existence, then we must reject these changes and hold on to our true human interactions.

Adam Johns said...

Kate - this is a fine response, and I especially like the details. It would have been even better, though, if you'd stated your thoughts on what the thesis *should* be, since you're concerned that it doesn't have one.

Lauren - Following Kate's advice, you do clarify your thesis in the revision. It's an awfully broad thesis, though - something more precise (even oriented around a particular example) would have been nice.

I downright admire your discussion of what you might have called "technologies" of family, although I'm less impressed with the way you contrast past stereotypes with contemporary reality - this kind of generalization needs specifics (especially in statistical form). I wonder why your thesis didn't focus on "technologies of family"?

Your discussion of Ware is able, but incomplete. You do a fine job of detailing the ways in which his life is hollow, and especially the absence of the family. What is missing is a detailed discussion of the ways in which *technology* produces his emptiness. Beginning with his telephone-mediated relationship with his mother (and his use of an answering machine and tape recorder) would have been a good way to approach this issue, although there are others. You're not quite finishing the link to McKibben, though.

You end on the notion, influenced by McKibben, that we need to reject at least some technologies. This is fine, but it has the same problem as the beginning - it's overly general. What technologies would you have us reject, and how? This seems, in some ways, like it wants to become an essay against the culture of cell phones/instant messaging/Facebook/etc., but that you haven't quite found a way to do that yet.

There's a lot of good material here, but the beginning and end are overly vague, and you don't quite make the critical McKibben-Ware connection.