Wednesday, September 3, 2008

The House of Seven Gables

Kristine Latham

Dr. Adam Johns

Seminar in English Composition

September 3, 2008

History in “The House of Seven Gables”

“There will be a connection with the long past—a reference to forgotten events and personages, and to manners, feelings, and opinions, almost or wholly obsolete—which, if adequately translated to the reader, would serve to illustrate how much of old material goes to make up the freshest novelty of human life” (Hawthorne 5). History is inescapable in “The House of Seven Gables.” In the first five chapters of the romance novel, it is made clear people are doomed to recreate the faults of the past.
The actions of the past affecting the current generation is first demonstrated by Mrs. Hepzibah. Mrs. Hepzibah is a good woman who is trying to survive. She goes through life largely isolated and lonely, with the exception of her one friend Mr. Holgrave. Mrs. Hepzibah is giving to others that come to her shop. It does not take much convincing, even thought she was originally skeptical, for her to allow Phoebe to reside in her house, even after Master Clifford returns. Mrs. Hepzibah is a humble person and yet, she lives a life of loneliness. Her appearance is saddened by a permanent frown, and her unfavorable social conditions are only made worse by her facial predicaments.
Mrs. Hepzibah’s misfortune, as tale and legend claims, is a result of her residence in the house of seven gables. When Matthew Maule curses the Pyncheon estate, all of the inhabitants of the house from that point on have in some way been affected by negative circumstance and events.
Hawthorne’s interpretation of history is extremely well founded: People are subject to repeat history, not because of curse or spell, but rather because of common flaws that span from generation to generation. The judge does not need to be such a terrible person, but much like the first Pyncheon, he shows no affection towards others, thinking only of himself.
In our world, history is repeated, not due to a curse, but do to a refusal to learn from the past. In 1848 women spoke out and fought for their rights as citizens for the first time. In 1920, America took the first step towards ending sexism. Today, woman still fight discrimination in the work force. It took people 72 years to decide that women should be treated as equals to men. Today, in school, children are taught the horrible history of sexism. Our society preaches the positive effects of the women’s rights movement, glorifying the women that stood up against society to say that they are equals and should be treated as such.
A similar historical timeline takes place during the civil rights movement. Another time glorified by the history taught in elementary schools. Every fifth grader in America can tell you about the hero Martin Luther King who stood up against discrimination and Rosa Parks who refused to succumb to the injustice of the law.
Today, homosexual and bisexual individuals do not have the same privileges as all Americans. They are discriminated against by our government, a system formerly designed as a democracy to represent the rights of the people. Yet, in 2008, members of our society cannot marry in most states and do not have equal tax breaks as heterosexual couples in the states that they can be wed. Furthermore, homosexuals do not have the right, as spouses would, to make life altering decisions for their loved one while in a hospital.
In “The House of Seven Gables,” Hawthorne states that history is repeated not because of curses, but because of common faults across generations. His statement can be seen in the history of the world across many different cultures and through many different generations. Discrimination is the fault of our people; homosexuals are the group discriminated against in this generation. In generations to come, there will be history books that glorify the individuals that stood up against this injustice, and fought to protect our notion of equal rights.

4 comments:

Kristine said...

my paragraphs got lost when i posted. can you edit a post after its up?

Steve Clark said...

Seeing as I'm not a good writer, I'm not a good critiquer either, but I hope this helps at least a little bit haha

Overall, I’d say you did a really good job of responding to the prompt, since it seems, at least to me, to be a less “traditional” prompt that I know I would have had trouble responding to. That being said, I did have a few issues that you might want to look into for revision. First of all, I thought you chose a great passage for use in the first part, but it seems unused. Rather than just stating a quote/passage, it’s always better to delve into the quote, and dissect it piece by piece. You more or less stated the quote, then stated the theme, and then began to summarize the book in order to show the theme. Instead, you might want to further analyze the quote and explain to the reader why this quote was chosen. For example, the very first part of the quote “There will be a long connection to the past.” Rather than just letting the reader interpret the quote, explain what this long connection is that Hawthorne is referring to. In the prompt, it states specifically “demonstrate why we should take this quote as representing the role played by these ideas”.

As for the second part of the paper, you really did a good job of bringing up contemporary issues, and also did a good job of linking certain times in history to these contemporary issues. It also did a good job of relating back to Hawthorne. I might recommend that you play with the organization a little bit and the paragraphs seemed like they could have been supported a little better. Repetition for effect is not always a bad thing. Make sure that you are constantly referring to Hawthorne’s generalized view and relating it to your more specific historical proof. Remember that the prompt is to respond to Hawthorne. Rather than just setting up your point, saying that Hawthorne is right, you want to show why Hawthorne was right. You can also expand what Hawthorne said, but make sure that you do the former first.

One final recommendation I can make would be to try and link the two parts of your paper a little better. The first part of your essay could match up very well with your last part, and I think it would add a lot of effect if you used the passage you chose as a way to delve into your next point. The way it is now, you end the “summary” of the story, and then jump right into Hawthorne’s generalized view of the world. I think if you sort of followed the first thing I said, it would set you up really well to link the two parts a little bit better.

Kristine said...

Kristine Latham
Dr. Adam Johns
Seminar in English Composition
September 3, 2008
History in “The House of Seven Gables”
“There will be a connection with the long past—a reference to forgotten events and personages, and to manners, feelings, and opinions, almost or wholly obsolete—which, if adequately translated to the reader, would serve to illustrate how much of old material goes to make up the freshest novelty of human life” (Hawthorne 5). Hawthorne is saying that no matter what, history is inescapable. In “The House of Seven Gables”, it is made clear people are doomed to recreate the faults of the past. Old disasters and misfortunes all share a common cause with the history being created at this very second.
The actions of the past affecting the current generation is first demonstrated by Mrs. Hepzibah. Mrs. Hepzibah is mostly a good woman who is trying to survive. However, she goes through life largely isolated and lonely, with the exception of her one friend Mr. Holgrave. Mrs. Hepzibah is giving to others that come to her shop. It does not take much convincing, even thought she was originally skeptical, for her to allow Phoebe to reside in her house, even though she was originally extremely hesitant. Mrs. Hepzibah is a humble person and yet, she lives a life of loneliness. This life of loneliness goes to show as stated in the former quote that “there will be a connection with the long past” (Hawthorne 5). Her appearance is saddened by a permanent frown, and her unfavorable social conditions are only made worse by her facial predicaments.
Mrs. Hepzibah’s misfortune, according to legend, is a result of her residence in the house of seven gables. When Matthew Maule curses the Pyncheon estate, all of the inhabitants of the house from that point on have in some way been affected by negative circumstance and events. However, when examined more closely, Mrs. Hepzibah’s misfortune is a direct result of her making the same mistakes as her ancestors made. For example, Mrs. Hepzibah is determined to be an aristocratic woman. A woman that is better than the working class according to the tier of society. She is clearly ashamed the first day that her shop finally opens. This is demonstrated by her tears. While Mr. Holgrave does show more kindness to her than most, he also hates the very system that she stands for. Mr. Holgrave despises the aristocracy. He thinks that it is a noble thing to open a store and provide for others.
Hawthorne’s interpretation of history is made clear through the first five chapters of “The House of Seven Gables, and is extremely well founded: People are subject to repeat history, not because of curse or spell, but rather because of common flaws that span from generation to generation. This interpretation can be found in a variety of ways; both in “The House of Seven Gables” and society today.
In our world, history is repeated, not due to a curse, but do to a refusal to learn from the past. In 1848 women spoke out and fought for their rights as citizens for the first time. In 1920, America took the first step towards ending sexism. Today, woman still fight discrimination in the work force. It took people 72 years to decide that women should be treated as equals to men. Today, in school, children are taught the horrible history of sexism. Our society preaches the positive effects of the women’s rights movement, glorifying the women that stood up against society to say that they are equals and should be treated as such.
A similar historical time line takes place during the civil rights movement. Another time glorified by the history taught in elementary schools. Every fifth grader in America can tell you about the hero Martin Luther King who stood up against discrimination and Rosa Parks who refused to succumb to the injustice of the law.
Today, homosexual and bisexual individuals do not have the same privileges as all Americans. They are discriminated against by our government, a system formerly designed as a democracy to represent the rights of the people. Yet, in 2008, members of our society cannot marry in most states and do not have equal tax breaks as heterosexual couples in the states that they can be wed. Furthermore, homosexuals do not have the right, as spouses would, to make life altering decisions for their loved one while in a hospital.
In “The House of Seven Gables,” Hawthorne states that history is repeated not because of curses, but because of common faults across generations. His statement can be seen in the history of the world across many different cultures and through many different generations. Discrimination is the fault of our people; homosexuals are the group discriminated against in this generation. In generations to come, there will be history books that glorify the individuals that stood up against this injustice, and fought to protect our notion of equal rights.

Adam Johns said...

Steve: You provide an excellent counterexample to your allegedly weak writing skills with what I find (as I believe Kristine did) to be a detailed an insightful response.

Kristine Taken *as a revision* this is the best work so far - you took Steve's suggestions seriously, and ended up with a greatly improved paper.

You do a good job, in this version, of unpacking the curse as a metaphor. It can be fun, as you recognize, to treat the curse literally, and doing so isn't wrong, but that's not the main point; you're very effective on what the curse *means*. You could have done a better job being more explicit about Hawthorne's *concept* of history, but you cover it well implicitly: history is the perpetuation of error, I think is what you'd say.

You ably move that argument into the present. While I'm not as confident as you are that we've moved beyond racism and sexism, I don't think that skepticism damages your point much.

I would have liked to hear just a little more about whether we can get past history as an endless accumulation of errors or if you, like Hawthorne (seemingly) feel we can't get past it.